|
|
||
Too many
corporate types think they |
|||
Download the NewsOnF1.com |
Heretic: Good to hear from you again! The Heretic replies: Jim, It is good to hear from you again, too. When I started writing this column I felt that my focus was around half on the cars and half on the drivers. Today, I confess, I believe that the cars make a far greater contribution to the outcome and, sad as it may be, drivers make a much smaller contribution. That does not mean that I believe that the drivers are of little consequence but even there the emphasis has changed from flair, daring and skill to a much more cerebral skill set. Planning and controlled execution of the odds has become far more valuable than the ability to drive on the thin red line, like it was in my days. A good car will get a mediocre driver on the podium while a great driver will not finish a mediocre car in the points. Having said that, I suspect that drivers like David Coulthard can semi retire in a good car and still look OK. Their car is so superior that it is not obvious that they are no longer putting in 100%. I am really not impressed with Toyota, merely the fact that this team, that has managed to achieve so little so far, has eventually managed to pull away from the trailing edge. Their overall performance to date is close to pathetic. With their budget they should at least be ahead of the fund challenged teams by now. But, it was nice to see some progress. I am not too sure that I am impressed with Jaguar either – sure Jordan does not impress me at all and that does get into the area where I do allow my emotions to get involved. There are drivers like Villeneuve, Button, and Fisichella that seem to keep on getting into the wrong car at the wrong time. Over time it destroys their careers. In my opinion Fisichella had the ability to do well and he may still have it, but he is likely to retire well below his capability through plain bad luck. Jaguar deserved a good word because for once, as a team, they did not totally screw up. Jordan, with almost the same motor, looked pedestrian. I am not convinced that Jordan’s only problem is the Cosworth in the back. Eddie has lost too many of his key staff and I think what we are seeing is the consequence of not having the skills pool to build the chassis they used to have. Jordan could survive another year on their share of the takings for this year (thanks to Fisi’s win) but I suspect that Minardi are doing it too hard to even get enough points to survive. It will be a sad day as they have been responsible for bringing a lot of talent into the sport – not only drivers either. I agree that BAR and Honda retiring will not affect anything, but where does Button and Villeneuve go? Engines have no nationality. Ilmore may be built in Britain, originally owned by Brits, but the team working on them is as multicultural as the EEC. For years now it has only been a small group of experts that follow the biggest pay around Europe. Looking in from the outside I suspect that there are only enough of these to build three or four competitive engines and the learning curve for the rest is too steep. If the Japanese can’t catch up we’ll have to live with what we have. Teams like Jordan and Minardi (and even Williams) will not survive as independents. Sooner or later a bad season will send them broke. At present, it seems that the only sponsors with deep enough pockets that perceives a benefit in being in F1, are the manufacturers. I don’t think it is bad, just different. I agree, Toyota’s livery sucks. Finally, although I agree with your observation that too many corporate types believe that they can manage a F1 team, I suspect that, again, there are very few that can and they are all spoken for. The sport has evolved to a point where virtually every job needs a lifetime of experience. Back to Top Loading
|
|