This is a complete farce! 

Main Page Formula 1 News 2016 F1 Schedule 2016 F1 Line-up 2015 F1 Results F1 Teams F1 Drivers NewsOnF1 Mobile 10 'n' Pole Register - Submit F1 Regulations The Forums Live F1 Coverage Motorsport Shop UK - USA Motorsport Calendar F1 Merchandise UK F1 Merchandise USA F1 Tours F1 Tickets F1 Diecast F1 Videos F1 Games F1 Trivia NewsOnF1 on Twitter MotoGP Tickets Past Formula 1 Seasons 2015 F1 Results 2014 F1 Results 2013 F1 Results 2012 F1 Results 2011 F1 Results 2010 F1 Results 2009 F1 Results 2008 F1 Results 2007 F1 Results 2006 F1 Results 2005 F1 Results 2004 F1 Results 2003 F1 Results 2002 F1 Results 2001 F1 Results 2000 F1 Results 1999 F1 Results 1998 F1 Results 1997 F1 Results Links 2010 World Cup Translate Search Contact Us About Archives Your Say Diagnosis & Prognosis By the Heretic Controversy Corner The Real Race By the Quali-flyer F1 Testing F1 Team Reports 8 'n' Pole 2006 World Cup

Download the NewsOnF1.com
toolbar powered by Alexa

Other responses

I agree this is a complete farce. You end up with a group of Lawyers/Engineers picking a complex rules set to pieces. I say go back to a well defined safety standard that is reasonable. 
Motorsport is dangerous, the drivers know that every time they strap into a car they could die. They still do it and enjoy it. I am not being cavalier about driver safety here but if safety is the ultimate goal why are the drivers not using a remote cockpit to steer the car around the track? 
I say a technical rules set self-limited by 3 factors should suffice. 
1) 150L of fuel for the whole race, no more or less. 
2) Tyres made to a control standard by 3-4 manufacturers. 
3) Brakes limited to Iron 12" discs with 4 pot callipers and no Carbon/Carbon brakes. 

This would provide competitive racing where innovation is possible - Michael D - New Zealand (Reference Heretic 5-01 - Do it the FIA way or else)

The Heretic replies:

Although I agree with your comments I am not sure that I agree with your assumption that the FIA are trying to reach a reasonable objective like making the sport safer.

This year the sport will be more dangerous because there are almost no changes that will slow the cars down – so that could not be what they wanted to achieve.

The new rules will make the sport substantially more expensive in the short term with a small chance that it will eventually make it cheaper – so that could not be the motivation.

The new rules will probably make it harder to overtake and is guaranteed to make the first lap confusing and consequently add to the risk of carnage at the first corner. Surely they did not plan to achieve that?

You got it in one – A complete farce. If that was the objective they achieved it in flying colours.

The Heretic

Back to Top
Other responses
Back to the Diagnosis & Prognosis Main Page