Formula 1 news, results and statistics when you need it

There is total contradiction in this report! 

Main Page Formula 1 News 2016 F1 Schedule 2016 F1 Line-up 2015 F1 Results F1 Teams F1 Drivers NewsOnF1 Mobile 10 'n' Pole Register - Submit F1 Regulations The Forums Live F1 Coverage Motorsport Shop UK - USA Motorsport Calendar F1 Merchandise UK F1 Merchandise USA F1 Tours F1 Tickets F1 Diecast F1 Videos F1 Games F1 Trivia NewsOnF1 on Twitter MotoGP Tickets Past Formula 1 Seasons 2015 F1 Results 2014 F1 Results 2013 F1 Results 2012 F1 Results 2011 F1 Results 2010 F1 Results 2009 F1 Results 2008 F1 Results 2007 F1 Results 2006 F1 Results 2005 F1 Results 2004 F1 Results 2003 F1 Results 2002 F1 Results 2001 F1 Results 2000 F1 Results 1999 F1 Results 1998 F1 Results 1997 F1 Results Links 2010 World Cup Translate Search Contact Us About Archives Your Say Diagnosis & Prognosis By the Heretic Controversy Corner The Real Race By the Quali-flyer F1 Testing F1 Team Reports 8 'n' Pole 2006 World Cup

Download the NewsOnF1.com
toolbar powered by Alexa

Other responses

Well, there is total contradiction in this report. If Ferrari is so objective and professional , they would not have made such a massive mistake hoping that the fans and everyone will forget this soon. Of course it is hard to say why they did it (It was an obviously bad move), my guess goes like this: -> 
Ferrari wants to make it clear that Rubens stands a fair and equal chance within the team, he gets an equally good car, BUT Michael should win as he's leading and the #1 -> 
The decision about moving over has come from *external and very influential* parties (maybe someone who pays), who would like to secure the DC too, but it came down a bit late!! And a qn to Michael: Whose the Boss? - GOP - NL (Reference Heretic 4-13 - Confusing corporate objectives with sport)

The Heretic replies:

Hi GOP,

The contradiction is not in the report but as you point out in the way it was done.

Manipulating the outcome of the race is allowed. I believe that Ferrari have an obligation to not do it that blatantly. I believe that Ferrari made this decision (at least as a policy) before the start of the season – not during the race. I believe that we will see more of the same (less blatant, I hope).

Unfortunately, what I believe is of little consequence when billions of sponsorship dollars are involved. That is the real boss.

The Heretic

Back to Top
Other responses
Back to the Diagnosis & Prognosis Main Page