Formula 1 news, results and statistics when you need it

I am a realist!  

Main Page Formula 1 News 2016 F1 Schedule 2016 F1 Line-up 2015 F1 Results F1 Teams F1 Drivers NewsOnF1 Mobile 10 'n' Pole Register - Submit F1 Regulations The Forums Live F1 Coverage Motorsport Shop UK - USA Motorsport Calendar F1 Merchandise UK F1 Merchandise USA F1 Tours F1 Tickets F1 Diecast F1 Videos F1 Games F1 Trivia NewsOnF1 on Twitter MotoGP Tickets Past Formula 1 Seasons 2015 F1 Results 2014 F1 Results 2013 F1 Results 2012 F1 Results 2011 F1 Results 2010 F1 Results 2009 F1 Results 2008 F1 Results 2007 F1 Results 2006 F1 Results 2005 F1 Results 2004 F1 Results 2003 F1 Results 2002 F1 Results 2001 F1 Results 2000 F1 Results 1999 F1 Results 1998 F1 Results 1997 F1 Results Links 2010 World Cup Translate Search Contact Us About Archives Your Say Diagnosis & Prognosis By the Heretic Controversy Corner The Real Race By the Quali-flyer F1 Testing F1 Team Reports 8 'n' Pole 2006 World Cup

Download the NewsOnF1.com
toolbar powered by Alexa

Other responses

Dear Heretic, 

A couple of points. I think Prost has a smaller budget than Minardi. My emotions tell me that McLaren and D.C. will be in the championship hunt this year with Ferrari finishing second and Williams third. 
However, My logic tells me the odds on favourite has to be Ferrari with Williams and McLaren battling for second. Unless Ferrari makes a complete mess of their new car I don't see anyone that has a better car or better drivers, and even if the new car doesn't work out M.S. could probably win in last years car. 
This doesn't mean I'm a big Schumacher fan, I'm not, but I am a realist. So, for 2002 my money is on Ferrari/Schumacher - Jeff S - USA (Reference Heretic 4-01)

The Heretic replies:

I must agree with you. When you are going bust by definition you have the smallest budget. I am sure that they have however managed to set aside a big enough budget to ensure that they can afford the 1,273 tints that are required to ensure that the blue paint is very French. This may be their problem – I would be more concerned with the driveability and speed of the car, but who am I to judge?

Sure, statistically Ferrari will still be dominant. Schumacher is the most competent and experienced driver. Theoretically and practically they must be the team to beat (and I said so) BUT: What they are planning (if the rumours are true) may pay off but is seriously risky. To me it sounds like a brave move into uncharted territory – it could go either way.

As you say they can fall back on last year’s car but if this year’s cars are as much faster again as they were last year it will not make Ferrari competitive.

You could be right, easily, but if I am right it would be a lot more fun to watch towards the end of the season.

The Heretic

Back to Top
Other responses
Back to the Diagnosis & Prognosis Main Page